International NGO · Written recruitment test
Practical exercise
Mine Action Operations Officer
- Duty station
- Ziguinchor department, Ziguinchor region (Senegal)
- Time allowed
- 75 min
- Marks
- 100 marks
- Pass mark
- 60 %
- Profile
- Officer, 2 to 4 years of experience
Instructions
- The test lasts 75 minutes. It is marked out of 100; the pass mark for the interview is 60.
- Answer in English, in a structured way. Show your workings: a correct result without workings receives only half the marks.
- Calculator and spreadsheet allowed. Any outside help (another person, artificial intelligence) is forbidden.
- The documents are fictional but built on realistic data. State any assumption you make.
Original practice test, built on the format of written tests used by United Nations agencies and international NGOs. The context and figures are fictitious.
Documents provided
| Ref. | Information collected | Land use | Area (m²) | Population exposed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Mine accident involving one person in 2019, field abandoned since | Rice field | 4,800 | 320 |
| R2 | Former military position, no evidence of devices or accidents | Not used | 12,000 | 150 |
| R3 | Rumour; field cultivated every year since 2012 without incident, confirmed by 3 sources | Agriculture | 7,000 | 200 |
| R4 | Mine seen by a hunter who showed the location to the team | Access to the school | 2,600 | 450 |
| R5 | Rumour from a single indirect source; orchard worked every season, confirmed by 2 sources | Orchard | 3,500 | 80 |
| R6 | Cow killed by a mine in 2024 | Grazing land | 3,400 | 140 |
| R7 | Mine fragments found on the surface by the team | Return area for displaced people | 6,200 | 260 |
| R8 | Area avoided by the population, former camp, no accidents | Not used | 9,500 | 120 |
| R9 | A single unexploded shell, visible near a well | Water point | Not applicable | 300 |
| R10 | Accident in 2008 at the edge of the field; field cultivated every season since 2014; strip along the backwater never used (1,500 m²) | Agriculture | 8,000 | 90 |
| R11 | Mines visible after the rains, vehicle destroyed in 2025 | Main road | 1,900 | 600 |
| R12 | A former combatant says a row of mines was laid, without being able to locate the place | Cassava, abandoned | 5,000 | 180 |
- Confirmed hazardous area (CHA): direct evidence (accident, device seen by the team or by a reliable witness who can locate it).
- Suspected hazardous area (SHA): indirect evidence only; it goes to technical survey.
- Cancellation: regular and safe use of the land for at least 5 years, confirmed by at least 2 independent sources, without direct evidence.
- CHA priority grid: use (road, school or water 3; agriculture or return 2; grazing 1; not used 0) + population exposed (more than 300: 3; 100 to 300: 2; fewer than 100: 1) + accident since 2021 (2, otherwise 0). Tie: the highest population goes first.
- Capacities: 2 manual teams; clearance 250 m² per team per day; technical survey 1,000 m² per team per day; 20 working days per month.
Result
0 out of 100
Mark each answer honestly against the panel's grid: the total is calculated automatically.
Common mistakes that cost marks
- Classifying as a CHA an area based on mere rumour.
- Cancelling an entire area when part of it has never been used.
- Forgetting the tie rule in prioritisation.
- Letting someone bring an explosive device to the office or the session.
Useful references
- International Mine Action Standards (IMAS), land release series
- IMAS on non-technical survey and technical survey
- IMAS on explosive ordnance risk education