Monitoring, evaluation and data

MEAL: Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability and Learning

From the logframe to the final evaluation: the complete course for managing a project by results.

  • 5 days · 30 hours
  • Beginner to intermediate
  • 5 scenarios
  • Verifiable certificate
Start the course
  • Free, unlimited access
  • 5 one-day modules
  • 5 scenarios and 15 quiz questions
  • Final assessment of 20 questions
  • Certificate in your name, verifiable online

What you will learn

  • Explain the role of MEAL in the humanitarian project cycle.
  • Build a coherent theory of change and logframe.
  • Formulate SMART indicators and write a complete MEAL plan.
  • Choose the right data collection methods, calculate a sample size and ensure data quality.
  • Set up a complaints and feedback mechanism, and prepare an evaluation using the OECD DAC criteria.

Course information

Level
Beginner to intermediate
Study time
30 hours over 5 days (lessons, case studies, exercises)
Format
Online, at your own pace, free and unlimited access
Assessment
Daily quizzes + final exam of 20 randomly drawn questions (30 min, pass mark 70%)
Credential
Named, numbered certificate of achievement, verifiable online (QR code)
Reference frameworks
OECD-DAC · ALNAP (Buchanan-Smith, Cosgrave, Warner) · CHS Alliance, Groupe URD, Sphere

Programme

  1. Day1MEAL fundamentalsWhat does MEAL mean? · Monitoring and evaluation: the differences · MEAL in the project cycle · Reference standards · Ethics and data protection Scenario: First day as a MEAL officer
  2. Day2Theory of change and logframeFrom problem tree to objective tree · The theory of change · The results chain · The logframe Scenario: The logframe for a nutrition project
  3. Day3Indicators and the MEAL planWhat makes a good indicator? · Baseline, target and reference sheet · The indicator tracking table · The MEAL plan Scenario: Indicators for a water project
  4. Day4Data collection, quality and analysisData collection methods · Sampling · Data quality · Analysing and using data Scenario: A satisfaction survey that goes wrong
  5. Day5Accountability, evaluation and learningAccountability to affected populations · The complaints and feedback mechanism · Evaluation · Keeping learning alive Scenario: A serious complaint in the suggestion box
  6. Final assessment and certificate20 questions · 70% to pass · 3 attempts per 24 hours

Who is it for?

Project officers, MEAL assistants and officers, programme coordinators, staff of national and international NGOs.

The certificate

With at least 70% correct answers in the final assessment, you receive a certificate in your name, with a unique code that recruiters can verify on Humanitaires Jobs. A free Members area account is required.

Key concepts

The vocabulary you need to master for this course and the exam.

Theory of change
An explicit representation of how activities are expected to bring about the intended changes, with the assumptions.
Logframe
A matrix linking objectives, results, activities, indicators, means of verification and assumptions.
Outcome indicator
A measure of change among beneficiaries (behaviour, access, situation).
Baseline
The initial measurement of indicators, before the intervention.
Counterfactual
What would have happened without the intervention; the basis for attribution analysis.
Triangulation
Cross-checking sources, methods or enumerators to validate a finding.
Accountability to affected populations (AAP)
A commitment to inform, consult, collect complaints and act on them.
OECD-DAC criteria
Relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability.

References and recommended reading

The official texts and sector reference works on which the course is based.

  1. OECD-DAC (2019). Better Criteria for Better Evaluation: Revised Evaluation Criteria Definitions and Principles for Use. www.oecd.org/fr/cad/evaluation/criteres-cad-evaluation.htm
  2. ALNAP (Buchanan-Smith, Cosgrave, Warner) (2016). Evaluation of Humanitarian Action Guide. www.alnap.org/help-library/evaluation-of-humanitarian-action-guide
  3. CHS Alliance, Groupe URD, Sphere (2024). Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS). www.corehumanitarianstandard.org
  4. Sphere Association (2018). The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. spherestandards.org/fr/manuel-2018
  5. United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) (2016). Norms and Standards for Evaluation. www.unevaluation.org

Other sites to visit

ScholarshipsScholarMapScholarships around the world, with deadlines and official links.Free PDF toolsPDF EasyMerge, compress, convert to Word or JPG: free, no sign-up.NGO fundingNGO FundsWho funds whom in every country, funding needs and calls for proposals.UN and NGO tendersHumanitarian TendersGoods, services, works and consultancy contracts, country by country, with deadlines.