- Design a specialised GBV programme in line with the Inter-Agency Minimum Standards.
- Support complex cases by balancing safety, consent and best interests.
- Manage quality through data collected and shared ethically.
1The Inter-Agency Minimum Standards (2019)
The Inter-Agency Minimum Standards for Gender-Based Violence in Emergencies Programming, published by UNFPA and the GBV AoR, set sixteen standards grouped into three sets: the foundational standards (guiding principles, women's and girls' participation and empowerment, staff care and support), the programming standards (healthcare, mental health and psychosocial support, case management, referral systems, safety and risk mitigation, justice and legal aid, dignity kits and cash assistance, economic empowerment and livelihoods, transforming systems and social norms, women and girls safe spaces) and the coordination and management standards (preparedness, assessment, monitoring and evaluation, GBV data collection and use).
Each standard includes key actions and indicators. Examples: female staff for services to women, regular supervision of caseworkers, dignity kits designed with women and distributed as an entry point to services, a GBV risk analysis in all cash programming.
2Supporting complex cases
Some cases require careful analysis and close supervision:
- Child survivors: application of the Caring for Child Survivors (CCS) guidelines, the child's consent according to age and maturity, agreement of the parent or guardian unless that person is the perpetrator or puts the child at risk, coordination with child protection.
- Close or powerful perpetrator (husband, leader, humanitarian worker): reinforced safety plan, absolute discretion in movements, temporary accommodation solutions.
- Sexual exploitation and abuse by humanitarian personnel: reporting through the dedicated PSEA channel, immediate assistance without waiting for the investigation, the victim is never confronted with the perpetrator.
- Mandatory reporting obligation: know it, explain it before the interview, assess its risks with the supervisor and apply it while minimising the risks for the survivor.
The rule remains the same: the survivor, or the child according to their maturity, takes part in every decision, and every action is preceded by a safety assessment.
3GBVIMS, Primero and the sharing protocol
The GBVIMS includes a standard incident classification, an intake form and a consent form, a recording tool (or its electronic version GBVIMS+ on Primero) and an information sharing protocol that specifies who receives which statistics, how often and for what purpose.
Good practices: specific consent for sharing non-identifying data, codes instead of names, grouping of small areas to avoid identification, trend analysis (types of incidents, time to access care, locations) to adapt programmes. A key indicator is the proportion of rape survivors who received PEP within 72 hours: a low rate signals access barriers to be removed.
4Quality, accountability and staff care
Quality is managed through supervision of caseworkers (case file reviews, observation, case studies), confidentially conducted client satisfaction surveys, focus group discussions with women on the accessibility of services and an adapted complaints mechanism. Feedback is used to adjust opening hours, locations and staff profiles.
GBV work exposes staff to vicarious trauma: a manageable caseload, supervision, recovery time and psychological support are part of the programme and the budget. An exhausted team makes confidentiality and safety errors.
Exercise: reviewing a GBV programme
Over six months, a GBV programme reports: 312 incidents recorded, including 74 rapes; 29 rape survivors received PEP within 72 hours; 3 caseworkers for 140 active cases; no activity outside the main town; no safe space accessible to women with disabilities. Calculate the proportion of timely PEP, identify five gaps against the Minimum Standards and propose a costed improvement plan for the next six months.
Key points
- Minimum Standards 2019: sixteen standards, from foundational principles to data management.
- Child survivors: consent according to maturity, best interests, guardian set aside if he is the perpetrator.
- PSEA: dedicated reporting channel, immediate assistance, never any confrontation with the perpetrator.
- GBVIMS: consent, codes, sharing protocol, trend analysis; PEP within 72 hours as a key indicator.
- Quality: supervision, women's feedback, manageable caseload and staff care.
Further reading: course references
- Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) (2015). Guidelines for Integrating Gender-Based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action. gbvguidelines.org
- UNFPA, GBV AoR (2019). Inter-Agency Minimum Standards for Gender-Based Violence in Emergencies Programming. www.unfpa.org/minimum-standards
- IASC, GBV Guidelines Reference Group (2018). How to support survivors of gender-based violence when a GBV actor is not available in your area (GBV Pocket Guide). gbvguidelines.org
- WHO, UNFPA, UNHCR (2020). Clinical management of rape and intimate partner violence survivors: developing protocols for use in humanitarian settings. www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240001411
- Gender-Based Violence Information Management System Steering Committee (2017). Interagency Gender-Based Violence Case Management Guidelines. www.gbvims.com
- World Health Organization (2007). WHO ethical and safety recommendations for researching, documenting and monitoring sexual violence in emergencies. www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241595681
- Sphere Association (2018). The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. spherestandards.org/fr/manuel-2018
- GBV AoR, Global Protection Cluster (2024). Gender-Based Violence Area of Responsibility. gbvaor.net
Daily quiz
3 questions to check what you have learned. Answer them all to complete the day.