International NGO · Written recruitment test
Case study
MHPSS coordinator
- Duty station
- Les Cayes, Sud department (Haiti)
- Time allowed
- 120 min
- Marks
- 100 marks
- Pass mark
- 60 %
- Profile
- Senior, psychologist or psychiatrist, 6 years or more including 3 in emergencies
Instructions
- The test lasts 120 minutes. It is marked out of 100; the pass mark for the interview is 60.
- Context: three months after a (fictional) earthquake that killed 340 people; 85,000 people affected in the programme area.
- Calculator allowed. Show your calculations.
- Any outside help (another person, artificial intelligence) is forbidden.
- The data and cases are fictional. The planning assumptions are those of the test's MHPSS working group.
Original practice test, built on the format of written tests used by United Nations agencies and international NGOs. The context and figures are fictitious.
Documents provided
| Indicator | Month 1 | Month 2 | Month 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| People who received psychological first aid (PFA) | 2,400 | 1,900 | 900 |
| Participants in community support groups | 600 | 1,400 | 2,100 |
| People followed by counsellors (end of month) | 120 | 260 | 410 |
| Referrals to specialised care | 15 | 48 | 95 |
| Waiting for a specialised consultation (end of month) | 8 | 31 | 74 |
Month 3 referrals: psychosis 9; epilepsy 6; severe depression with suicidal ideation 22; alcohol use 18; moderate distress 40.
Resources: 1 psychiatrist (12 new patients per week for the programme); 4 psychologists; 18 non-specialist counsellors trained in a brief psychological intervention; 40 community volunteers. Programme standard: at most 20 people followed per counsellor.
Planning assumptions: 3 to 4% severe disorders; 15 to 20% mild to moderate disorders.
- Case A: a female counsellor reports that a 15-year-old girl has disclosed to her sexual abuse committed by a programme community volunteer.
- Case B: a journalist, sent by the headquarters communications department, wants to film a group session for a fundraising campaign.
- Case C: 6 of the 18 counsellors are asking for leave; several say they "can no longer sleep" since listening to families' accounts.
- A single, mandatory "psychological debriefing" session for all survivors.
- Systematic distribution of benzodiazepines to "stressed" people in health centres.
- Posting at the community centre of the list of "traumatised" people, to facilitate follow-up.
- Opening of a "trauma centre" separate from health services.
Result
0 out of 100
Mark each answer honestly against the panel's grid: the total is calculated automatically.
Common mistakes that cost marks
- Presenting PFA as a treatment or single-session debriefing as good practice.
- Leaving people with suicidal ideation on a waiting list.
- Asking the counsellor to investigate the volunteer or confront the alleged perpetrator.
- Calculating coverage without caution about the planning assumptions.
- Responding to the backlog only by requesting a second psychiatrist, without triage or task sharing.
- Ignoring the team's burnout.
Useful references
- IASC, Guidelines on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings (intervention pyramid)
- WHO, War Trauma Foundation and World Vision International, Psychological First Aid: Guide for Field Workers
- WHO and UNHCR, mhGAP Humanitarian Intervention Guide
- IASC, six core principles relating to sexual exploitation and abuse