- Comply with the donor's rules.
- Monitor the budget and request an amendment in time.
- Prepare reports, the audit and close-out.
1Compliance
- Eligibility of expenditure: within the contract period, provided for in the budget, actually incurred, supported by original documents.
- Procurement: the donor's thresholds and procedures (number of quotations, tender), procurement committee, no conflict of interest.
- Sanctions list screening for suppliers and partners, in line with donor requirements.
- Visibility: required logos and acknowledgements, except where security calls for a low profile (to be negotiated in writing).
- Sub-grants: the donor's rules also apply to partners; provide for a written agreement, a capacity assessment and financial monitoring.
2Budget monitoring and amendments
Every month, compare actual expenditure with the budget (budget versus actuals report, BvA) line by line and calculate the burn rate against the time elapsed. Donors generally allow transfers between lines up to a certain percentage (often 10 to 20% depending on the contract); beyond that, a written amendment approved before the expenditure is required.
If the project falls behind schedule, request a no-cost extension well before the end date, often at least one month beforehand depending on the contract, explaining the reasons and the new timeline.
3Reporting, audit and close-out
- Narrative reports: results against indicators, explained variances, stories of change, challenges and lessons learned.
- Financial reports: expenditure by line, consistent with the accounts and the narrative report.
- Audit: file supporting documents by budget line from the start; an audit is prepared every day, not the day before.
- Close-out: final payments, inventory and transfer of equipment according to the donor's rules, final report, refund of unspent funds, archiving of documents for the period required by the contract (often 5 years or more).
Six months in, and 40% of the budget spent
Ongoing multi-sector project
You are the grants manager. In month 6 of 12, budget versus actuals monitoring shows 40% expenditure and very unbalanced lines.
Equipment procurement is behind schedule; the fuel line is already at 90%; a supplier offers to “invoice now and deliver later”.
Decision 1 of 3What do you do about the supplier's offer?
Decision 2 of 3The fuel line is at 90% at mid-term. Your reaction?
Decision 3 of 3The project will not be able to finish on time. When should a no-cost extension be requested?
Key takeaways
Monthly monitoring, respect for eligibility, reallocations within the rules and anticipating amendments: this is what avoids disallowed costs.
Exercise: analysing a budget versus actuals report
In month 4 of 12, your “transport” line is 70% spent and your “training” line 5%. Write a 5-line analysis (probable causes, risks) and the measures: correction, reallocation within the authorised limit, or a request to the donor for an amendment.
Key points
- No expenditure outside the budget without prior written agreement.
- The budget versus actuals report is monthly, not quarterly.
- Request an extension early, with a revised timeline.
- Audit preparation starts on the first day of the project.
Further reading: course references
- DG ECHO (2024). Donor rules and guidelines (example: European Commission, ECHO). civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu
- IASC (2016). The Grand Bargain: commitments. interagencystandingcommittee.org/grand-bargain
- CHS Alliance, Groupe URD, Sphere (2024). Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS). www.corehumanitarianstandard.org
- FAO / partner NGOs (2017). Guide to writing project proposals. www.fao.org
Daily quiz
3 questions to check what you have learned. Answer them all to complete the day.