Day 1 of 4 · 6 hours · Level 1 Beginner

Understanding humanitarian negotiation

Learning objectives for today
  • Define humanitarian negotiation and what sets it apart from commercial negotiation.
  • Know its legal framework and principles.
  • Distinguish the roles of negotiator, mandator and support team.

1What is humanitarian negotiation?

Humanitarian negotiation covers all exchanges with the parties that control a territory or population (authorities, armed forces, non-state armed groups, community leaders) to secure the presence, access and action of humanitarian organisations for people in need.

It deals with three main subjects: access (passing a checkpoint, opening a road, bringing in a convoy), protection (obtaining respect for civilians, the wounded and health facilities) and programme modalities (selection of beneficiaries, distribution, local recruitment, visibility).

Unlike a commercial negotiation, some points are not negotiable: aid is given according to needs, the organisation keeps control of its resources and its lists, and it does not take sides.

2Legal framework and principles

International humanitarian law requires parties to a conflict to allow and facilitate the rapid and unimpeded passage of impartial humanitarian relief (Additional Protocol I, Article 70; Rule 55 of customary law) and to ensure the freedom of movement of humanitarian personnel (Rule 56). The parties may control convoys but may not refuse access arbitrarily.

The law sets the framework, but access is won through the relationship: a counterpart respects an organisation it sees as useful, predictable and impartial. The four principles (humanity, impartiality, neutrality, independence) are therefore also negotiation tools: they explain why the organisation works with everyone and cannot accept certain demands.

3Negotiator, mandator and support team

The CCHN distinguishes three roles that must be clear before any significant negotiation:

  • The frontline negotiator, who meets the counterpart and builds the relationship.
  • The mandator (head of mission, senior management), who sets the mandate, the objectives and the red lines, and takes the final decision.
  • The support team, who help analyse the context, prepare the files and look after the negotiator.

The negotiator does not decide alone on a compromise beyond their mandate: they go back to their mandator. This also protects them from pressure ("I need to consult my management").

4The negotiator's posture

A humanitarian negotiator is rarely in a position of strength: they have no weapons and no money to offer personally. Their strength lies in the legitimacy of their work, the trust they have built, their knowledge of the context and the support of their network.

  • Prefer a lasting relationship to a one-off win: you will see this counterpart again tomorrow.
  • Be consistent: what you say to one actor must be something the others could hear.
  • Take care of security: prepare a negotiation with the security focal point; never go alone to a risky meeting without the base knowing where you are.
Scenario

When the letter is not enough

Office of a district administrator

Your role

You are a project manager; you have come to present a new health programme.

You have written authorisation from the ministry. The district administrator receives you coldly: "The ministry is far away. Here, I decide. Why are you working in opposition villages?"

  1. Decision 1 of 3How do you begin?

  2. Decision 2 of 3He insists on the "opposition villages". You reply:

  3. Decision 3 of 3He asks to be kept informed of your activities. You:

Exercise: map your negotiations

List five negotiations your team has conducted or will need to conduct this month (a checkpoint, a work permit, a beneficiary list, a recruitment). For each one, state the subject (access, protection, programme), the counterpart, who plays the negotiator, who is the mandator, and what is not negotiable.

Key points

  • Three subjects: access, protection, programme modalities.
  • IHL: rapid and unimpeded passage of impartial relief (Rule 55); no arbitrary refusal.
  • Principles are also negotiation arguments.
  • Three roles: negotiator, mandator (red lines), support team.
  • The negotiator's strength: legitimacy, trust, knowledge, network.
Further reading: course references
  1. Centre of Competence on Humanitarian Negotiation (CCHN) (2019). CCHN Field Manual on Frontline Humanitarian Negotiation. frontline-negotiations.org
  2. OCHA (G. McHugh and M. Bessler) (2006). Humanitarian Negotiations with Armed Groups: A Manual for Practitioners. www.unocha.org
  3. ICRC (2005). Rule 55: access for humanitarian relief (customary international humanitarian law). ihl-databases.icrc.org/fr/customary-ihl/v1/rule55
  4. R. Fisher, W. Ury and B. Patton (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. www.pon.harvard.edu

Daily quiz

3 questions to check what you have learned. Answer them all to complete the day.

1Which point is never negotiable for a humanitarian organisation?
2Who sets the red lines of a negotiation?
3Rule 55 of customary international humanitarian law concerns:

← OverviewDay 2 →

Other sites to visit

ScholarshipsScholarMapScholarships around the world, with deadlines and official links.Free PDF toolsPDF EasyMerge, compress, convert to Word or JPG: free, no sign-up.NGO fundingNGO FundsWho funds whom in every country, funding needs and calls for proposals.UN and NGO tendersHumanitarian TendersGoods, services, works and consultancy contracts, country by country, with deadlines.