Day 3 of 4 · 6 hours · Level 2 Intermediate

Conducting the meeting and making the agreement hold

Learning objectives for today
  • Conduct a negotiation meeting, with or without an interpreter.
  • Manage tension, refusals and unacceptable demands.
  • Conclude, document and follow up the agreement.

1Conducting the meeting

A negotiation meeting generally has five stages:

  1. Greeting and introduction: introduce yourself and the organisation and its mandate in a few simple sentences; thank the counterpart.
  2. Island of agreement: start from shared facts and values.
  3. Listening: let the counterpart set out their position and concerns; ask open questions ("What worries you?").
  4. Options: propose several solutions that meet their concerns and your objectives.
  5. Conclusion: restate what has been agreed, who does what and when.

Respect local codes (greetings, time spent, tea, hierarchy), dress appropriately and preferably go in pairs: one person speaks, the other observes and takes notes after the meeting.

2Active listening and working with an interpreter

Active listening means showing that you have understood before replying: rephrasing ("If I understand correctly, you are worried that…"), naming emotions without judging them, summarising. A counterpart who feels understood is more open to proposals.

With an interpreter: brief them beforehand (objective, vocabulary, neutrality, confidentiality); speak in short sentences; look at your counterpart, not the interpreter; ask for a faithful translation, without summaries or additions. Choose an interpreter who will not be put in danger or seen as partisan by the counterpart.

3Tension, refusals and unacceptable demands

Faced with anger or threats, stay calm, lower your voice, listen and suggest a break if necessary. Never respond to provocation and never put your safety at risk for an agreement.

  • A refusal is not the end: ask what would allow the matter to be reconsidered, or offer to come back with more information.
  • Faced with an unacceptable demand (payment, a share of the aid, the beneficiary list, imposed recruitment), calmly explain why it is impossible, based on the principles and the organisation's policy, and propose an acceptable alternative (for example, informing the authorities of the selection criteria rather than giving names).
  • Do not promise anything beyond your mandate: "I will pass your request on to my management and come back to you."

4Concluding, documenting and following up

An oral agreement is restated at the end of the meeting, then documented as soon as you return: date, participants, requests, each party's commitments, open points, next step. The report goes to the mandator and, according to confidentiality rules, to the security focal point and the access working group.

An agreement is tested and followed up: a first small convoy, checking that commitments are kept, informing field teams and the guards at the checkpoint. Thank the counterpart when the agreement is applied: the relationship is built on commitments kept, on both sides.

Scenario

The last-minute demand

Distribution point, in the presence of an armed group

Your role

You are running a distribution negotiated last week.

Just as you are about to start, the armed group's representative demands that his men hand out the kits themselves "to avoid disorder". The crowd has been waiting since morning. Your colleagues are looking at you.

  1. Decision 1 of 3What is your first reaction?

  2. Decision 2 of 3He maintains his demand. What alternative do you propose?

  3. Decision 3 of 3He refuses any alternative. You:

Exercise: role play and meeting report

In pairs, play a ten-minute negotiation at a checkpoint: one plays the commander who refuses to let a medical convoy through, the other the negotiator. Swap roles. Then write a ten-line report of the meeting: participants, requests, commitments, open points, next step.

Key points

  • Five stages: greeting, island of agreement, listening, options, conclusion.
  • Active listening: rephrase, name emotions, summarise.
  • Interpreter briefed, neutral and protected; short sentences; look at the counterpart.
  • Unacceptable demand: explain through the principles and propose an alternative.
  • Restate, document, test and follow up the agreement.
Further reading: course references
  1. Centre of Competence on Humanitarian Negotiation (CCHN) (2019). CCHN Field Manual on Frontline Humanitarian Negotiation. frontline-negotiations.org
  2. OCHA (G. McHugh and M. Bessler) (2006). Humanitarian Negotiations with Armed Groups: A Manual for Practitioners. www.unocha.org
  3. ICRC (2005). Rule 55: access for humanitarian relief (customary international humanitarian law). ihl-databases.icrc.org/fr/customary-ihl/v1/rule55
  4. R. Fisher, W. Ury and B. Patton (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. www.pon.harvard.edu

Daily quiz

3 questions to check what you have learned. Answer them all to complete the day.

1Rephrasing what the counterpart says is used to:
2A commander demands a share of the aid to let the convoy through. You:
3After an oral agreement, the first thing to do when you get back is:

← Day 2Day 4 →

Other sites to visit

ScholarshipsScholarMapScholarships around the world, with deadlines and official links.Free PDF toolsPDF EasyMerge, compress, convert to Word or JPG: free, no sign-up.NGO fundingNGO FundsWho funds whom in every country, funding needs and calls for proposals.UN and NGO tendersHumanitarian TendersGoods, services, works and consultancy contracts, country by country, with deadlines.